but what you probably don't realize is that fire emblem is actually extremely unclear.
Maybe i'll do an update later and laugh at myself for bitching about bad rng when i was doing stuff badly.įirst off, I'd like to mention that you say things are very clear in fire emblem. I know this kind of things happen in XCOM and other strategy games, i've played a lot of fire emblem, but in those games, everything's super clear, and i'm having really big communication issues with XCOM 2.Įdit: Yeah, i get the aiming isn't as different from xcom1 as i recalled, it may be i haven't played enough xcom 2 so i don't know the rules well yet, but i do still feel like it's harder to get secured shots here compared to xcom 1. Now in XCOM 2 i'm fighting a muton with no cover from less than 8 tiles and i get 75% hit? Why? I find it so confusing why they decide to add so much complexity to the aiming and not explain things correctly, the odds seem to be on your favour but then you miss the 75% and get 1 hit by a crit. Even if an enemy was very agile or whatever, in XCOM 1 they moved a lot of tiles in 1 turn but you wouldn't get lower hit percentages for no reason (like with chryssalids).
They feel so arbitrary compared to xcom 1.
So i beat the game and decided to try out XCOM 2 instead of playing XCOM 1 on hard. So i finished xcom: enemy within last week, i had done a couple of ironman runs on commander difficulty (lost) and decided i should do normal as my first actual run.
0 kommentar(er)
